This year too the Jaipur Literary Festival had its creases, with the Dalits doing a big time pout at some comments by sociologist, Ashis Nandy. Last year it was Salman Rushdie's Satanic Verses that came in for major communal sulks.
I too did my little bit of sulking in response to Richard Dawkins' exhortation to people in India to stop wasting time on God, who didn't exist.
This piece appeared in the Agnel Ashram magazine.
I too did my little bit of sulking in response to Richard Dawkins' exhortation to people in India to stop wasting time on God, who didn't exist.
This piece appeared in the Agnel Ashram magazine.
The Dick Delusion
Dick is a very, very clever man
He does what every other man can:
He thinks!
Only
he does it much better.
Or so he thinks.
For
he follows the rules
Of that god called Science. He uses the tools
Of Reason, Mathematics and Logic.
(Not God with a capital G. Or Magic.)
Peering through electron microscope
Looking up the great Hubble telescope
He can see what every other man can
Only better than any other man.
Using pure theorem and syllogism
To demonstrate to one and all: the chasm
Between Rational Man and a thing called God
That made the earth with a word and a nod.
Nay says Dick, the only god he knows is
A blind watchmaker who fashioned all this
With a series of accidents that fell into place
In a book by Darwin, a charlie who says
Your great-grandpa was an ape and that you
Are what you are today because a few
Million years ago you or rather your genes
Did some selfish cherry picking, the means
By which Evolution separated
The boys from the men who grew up and dated
Your great-grandma. And so you are today
What you are today, hip hip and hurray!
Here in Jaipur, attending the Litfest
Reading from Satan and thumping your chest
And chanting “Aye! Aye !” in unholy fusion
With the author of The God Delusion.
Will someone please tell this clever man, Dick
That Truth is revealed to Science and Logic.
As well as to Metaphor, Intuition
Fairy Tale, Myth and Imagination
That God does not play hide-and-seek under
Microscopes and telescopes. His wonder
Is not unravelled by sums and equations
Or clever syllogistic deductions.
He is not a Q.E.D. at the end
Of a theorem, my dear memetic friend.
He may not be seen by the curious eye.
Or fathomed by crafty brain.
The
High
Priest and theologian too may not see
Through ground glass lenses of theology
Dogma, doctrine and apologetics
And all their studied catechetics
The true vision of that divinity.
Get real and accept that Infinity
Lies beyond the finite grasp of Logic
Even the logic of a very clever Dick.
The eyes that see Eternity are not
Up in the head but in the human heart
Magnified by Infinity’s lenses
Of Faith and Love -- not the senses.
Faith will see through a multitude of sins
What till now has been hid from Dick Dawkins.
Wonderfully said. Enjoyed reading it.
ReplyDeleteCarl Sagan on God: “If by God one means the set of physical laws that govern the universe, then clearly there is such a God.”
ReplyDeleteSo what makes this Dick believe that this mind-boggling set of physical laws was fashioned by a blind watchmaker, who relied on a series of accidents.
It’s unfortunate that one turns to scientists with the question: Does God exist? The world of science is still divided on whether or not the universe had a beginning. In developing the theory of relativity, Einstein realized that the equations led to the conclusion that the universe had a beginning. He didn't like the idea of a beginning, because he thought one would have to conclude that the universe was created by God. So, he added a cosmological constant to the equation to attempt to get rid of the beginning. He said this was one of the worst mistakes of his life. Later, the results of Edwin Hubble confirmed that the universe was expanding and had a beginning at some point in the past. So, Einstein became a deist - a believer in an impersonal creator God:
Science, has no answer either to how life began and why death is a constant. So why is one turning to science to grasp something for which there is no empirical evidence. Can the existence of the emotion of love, for example, be confirmed through empirical evidence in a laboratory? And yet, no one denies that love exists.
This is outside the realm of reason, mathematics and logic which Dick embraces. He needs to step out of it and look at the flowers in the field, the birth of a child, the morning sun to feel and experience the presence of a creator. In just the same way you can only feel and experience love. And know it exists.
Sorry Ivan, I couldn't introduce a controversy to your point of view. Enjoyed reading the piece in verse. Robin
Wow, Robin! That was a scholarly clip to my piece. Reason upholding the rhyme. A solid pedestal to fragile verse. Thanks, that was welcome.
DeleteAah, Ivan this was superb and very enjoyable even to non-poets like me.
ReplyDeletePower to your verse.
Roland.
Toronto.
No poet am I, Roland. It's just that when words and reason fail me, I trip into rhyme. In any case I enjoy it. More so when friends like you do too. Thanks, Roland.
Delete